Magellan Maestro 3225 Maps

* According to existing rules can not register an ancient site in the Public Registry, but you can destroy any cultural heritage

Vistaprevia / Hugo MendozaCH.

The current laws and regulations do not protect the cultural heritage, on the contrary allow plunder. A clear example is what can happen to the historic center of Arequipa, which in 2000 was declared as Cultural Heritage Site by UNESCO.

Peruvian law does not favor their care. This is reflected in the errors that are committed the formulation of laws.

is the case law Ratings Regularization 29090 Urban and Buildings, 25 September 2007, where he commits a serious error or omission. It turns out that this law is not covered, including requirements for obtaining a construction permit municipal heritage areas, prior approval of the National Institute of Culture (INC).

While the INC may declare the old houses as cultural heritage, surprisingly they can not enroll in the Public Registry that current rules do not.

This same law in its Article 30 refers to the regularization of buildings constructed. This standard gives a deadline of December 31, 2008 to regulate the properties built after July 20, 1999. Areas include protection of national heritage, such as the historic center of Arequipa.
SUNARP
But the complacency of the INC does not allow to register a historic property. Through the Public Records Report No. 308-2007-ZR.N º XII-PI/GR claims that the laws 27580 and 28296 and other regulations (consolidated text of the law 27157 approved Supreme Decree No. 035-2006-housing) has banned the process of regularization of buildings in assets belonging to the cultural heritage of the nation. According

the architect Manuel Lazo Rodríguez, the two Acts referred to public records show clearly that the properties can be regularized. "Public Records makes a misinterpretation of the rule, the laws 27580 and 28296 state that the historical center properties can regularize" he notes.
The National Institute of Culture through the letter No. 347 2007-0A/INC maintains that it is possible to stabilize any type of work carried out in a building of the cultural heritage of the nation.

Hundreds of laws have been issued to protect the cultural heritage have always had grave mistakes, for example, Supreme Decree N º 003-2006-Housing, must comply with a mandate of Law 27580 which provides protective measures to be applied by the INC for the execution of works in cultural property, instead prohibited the recording of their capital assets, violating article 13 of the General Law of National Cultural Heritage.

The INC, the Provincial Municipality and Public Records to have the power to correct the existing rules. Cultural heritage around Arequipa and Peru is at risk with such standards.