* The provincial municipality suspended a month ago the expansion of road transport company COTASPA, but the company continued to circulate
* Last week caused an accident that left 29 injured, this incident happened in the suspended route
Vistaprevia / Hugo Mendoza CH.
The fatal accident of a coaster that was in Cayman last week with the toll of 29 injured, was avoided. It happens that the Provincial Municipality of Arequipa on 24 September this year, suspended the expansion path COTASPA Transportation Company, however, the company continued and continues to circulate with the coming of the provincial municipality.
The weekly had access to the Mayor's Resolution No. 540 which in turn declared null Antitrust office of the resolutions of its extensions filed by the company COTASPA.
Although the coasters were not circular, the MPA has not done anything about it. COTASPA company in 2006 obtained two extensions of routes. The first concerns the sector of Juan Pablo Guzman Vizcardo to Simon Bolivar and the second extension is for the High Cayma, Committee 16. COTASPA
initially had two routes, the A028 my Work City, Cercado, La Libertad and the A029 route and means of delivery (AO AO29A 29B), Juan Pablo Vizcardo and Guzman, Yanahuara Crystals and Pachacutec, but it's the latter path where problems arise.
FAVORS "?
The Provincial Municipality in 2004 through a resolution Directorial canceled the route COTASPA service drop, but the company filed an appeal. On August 10, 2005 through Resolution No. 628-2005 Mayor declared unfounded COSTASPA ordering.
Having exhausted the administrative part of the war continued in the judiciary. The company filed a lawsuit COTASPA Administrative Litigation against the Municipality, in order to set aside the Resolution of Hall effect, which sanctioned the cancellation COTASPA A029 route and means of delivery.
Given this fact, the Tenth Civil Court injunction issue has not innovate for COTASPA with this provision the company undertook not to alter the route and respect. The company COTASPA
demand Administrative Litigation against the MPA, first loses. In the statement of January 18, 2007, is declared as groundless litigation. However COTASPA has appealed and is currently in the Second Chamber for Civil.
Among the sea of \u200b\u200btroubles that come from the year 2004, the company succeeded in expanding COTASPA the A029 route. The first was on September 25, 2006 and the second on 24 April. Yamel Romero management was willing to give when the expansion of routes, although not resolved the problem in the courts.
The conflict over the A029 route is not when finished. Genesis Enterprise High the Moon had problems with COTASPA by expanding it. Simón Balbuena management on 24 April this year through the Management Resolution 1006 succeed in reconciling between the two companies, with the modification of some streets. MORE ERRORS
Balbuena management acted in the same way former mayor Yamel Romero authority by not inhibited on the issue until the judiciary to resolve the administrative action.
Officials at the United Transport Company Passenger & Service (ETPSSA) were also affected by the expansion of routes for COTASPA granted. Therefore
29 January 2007 members of the MPA ETPSSA present a case where demand the annulment of the route increases, also calling for the inhibition by the Provincial Municipality pending resolution of the administrative action.
"We hope for more than six months and our order has just come true in September," says Hugo Shock Sayco, ETPSSA company manager, referring to the Mayor's resolution is declared invalid where enlargements. For his part Jose Talavera Ortega reports that "the municipality is not enforcing the rules."
funny thing is that the company once collected COTASPA route extensions presented the request to inhibition Balbuena management. The Resolution of Hall's June 25, 2007 is declared founded COTASPA request by both the MPA must be inhibited until the judiciary ultimately resolve the dispute.
The same order of inhibition ETPSSA submitted in January this year was attended on September 24, 2007, however COTASPA presented the request in May and June and had results. Apparently Transport managers Balbuena management have a heart of COTASPA.
0 comments:
Post a Comment